Bills — National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · 6 Nov 2025 · 13:40
Passed by a small majority
90
Yes (ayes)
45
No (noes)
The question is that the bill be read a second time.

What was debated in Parliament

Summarised using AI from the official Hansard transcript of the debate only. It is not a record of the debate and may leave things out. Read the Hansard below to check it.
This bill sets up a National Environmental Protection Agency, described by the Government as Australia's first national, independent environmental regulator with new powers and penalties. It was part of a package of changes to national environment law. The short debate in this transcript focused on amendments about how the agency's leaders are chosen and how open its decisions are, and on how much time the House had for debate.
Arguments made in support
The Government said the agency would be Australia's first national, independent environmental regulator, with strong new powers and penalties to protect and restore the environment.
The Government said the bill works with wider law changes to deliver stronger protections, faster and sturdier project assessments, and more trust in decisions.
The Government said its model keeps compliance and enforcement independent while the minister stays accountable for approvals.
The Government said publishing reasons for every routine decision would be an undue burden, and the reforms already publish recommendation reports for approvals.
A Labor member later said the agency, starting on 1 July 2026, answered long-standing community calls for a stronger environmental regulator.
Arguments made against, or for changes
Independent member Sophie Scamps moved amendments to create an independent board that would choose the agency's CEO, saying a minister-appointed CEO would weaken trust.
Her amendments called for public advertising and an independent panel to shortlist board members, with at least one Indigenous member.
Independent member Allegra Spender moved an amendment requiring the agency to publish reasons for its decisions, not just notice of them.
The Coalition said the Government cut debate short and stopped it asking the minister questions about the bills.
The Coalition said both conservation and business groups found the bills unworkable, and raised concerns about the agency's broad powers and limits on the minister's oversight of the CEO.
24 speeches by 7 members in the House over 2 sitting days.
Hansard: House of Representatives, 30 Oct 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 6 Nov 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia

How each party voted

Labor
87 Yes
0 No
7–
LNP
0 Yes
15 No
1–
Liberal
0 Yes
14 No
3–
Independent
2 Yes
7 No
1–
Nationals
0 Yes
7 No
1–
Centre Alliance
1 Yes
0 No
Greens
0 Yes
1 No
Katter
0 Yes
0 No
1–
The last column counts members who did not vote. Party counts are for current members.
1 vote was cast by people who have since left Parliament.

No rebels

Every party member who voted went with the majority of their party.
Source: Hansard, House of Representatives, 6 Nov 2025
Parliament of Australia, via OpenAustralia Foundation · checked 14 October 2026