Bills — Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025; Limitation of Debate

Senate · 1 Apr 2026 · 11:32
Not passed by a small majority
25
Yes (ayes)
34
No (noes)
The question is that amendments on sheet 3768 and 3769 be agreed to.

What was debated in Parliament

Summarised using AI from the official Hansard transcript of the debate only. It is not a record of the debate and may leave things out. Read the Hansard below to check it.
This bill brings businesses that hold digital assets, such as crypto, for customers under Australia's financial services laws. It creates two new financial products, digital asset platforms and tokenised custody platforms, which will need a licence and must meet ASIC standards on custody and disclosure, with an exemption for small operators and an 18-month transition. Speakers from all sides backed the bill, and the debate focused on consumer protection, how long the reform had taken, and what it left out.
Arguments made in support
The Government said businesses can currently hold unlimited client digital assets with no financial law safeguards, and pointed to the FTX collapse and crypto scams.
Government members said the bill applies a simple principle: if you hold assets for clients, you meet the same standards, whether dollars or digital.
Coalition speakers welcomed the legal clarity, saying uncertainty and ASIC's court-based enforcement had driven investment and jobs offshore.
The Greens and independent Allegra Spender supported the bill, saying it closes regulatory gaps and gives honest firms certainty.
Supporters said using the existing licence system avoids a new regime and lowers compliance costs.
Arguments made against, or for changes
Coalition speakers said the reform took too long and Australia had fallen behind places like the UK, EU and US.
Coalition MP Simon Kennedy said the bill does not address debanking, stablecoin payments, broker-model platforms or group licensing.
Coalition MP Tim Wilson questioned whether ASIC could do the job and said the Coalition wanted a committee inquiry.
Allegra Spender urged recognition of overseas crypto rules and said 'pump and dump' token schemes would fall outside the new rules.
In the Senate, Coalition amendments sought a review after two years and required banks to give reasons for refusing service; Senator Pocock backed the review.
25 speeches by 20 members in the House and Senate over 5 sitting days.
Hansard: House of Representatives, 26 Nov 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 3 Feb 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 4 Feb 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 5 Feb 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 1 Apr 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia

How each party voted

Labor
0 Yes
23 No
6–
Liberal
17 Yes
0 No
3–
Greens
0 Yes
9 No
One Nation
3 Yes
0 No
1–
Independent
0 Yes
1 No
1–
CLP
1 Yes
0 No
LNP
1 Yes
0 No
1–
UAP
1 Yes
0 No
Nationals
0 Yes
0 No
3–
Lambie
0 Yes
0 No
1–
Australia's Voice
0 Yes
0 No
1–
The last column counts members who did not vote. Party counts are for current members.
3 votes were cast by people who have since left Parliament.

No rebels

Every party member who voted went with the majority of their party.
Source: Hansard, Senate, 1 Apr 2026
Parliament of Australia, via OpenAustralia Foundation · checked 14 October 2026