Bills — Australian Centre for Disease Control Bill 2025, Australian Centre for Disease Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Limitation of Debate

Senate · 5 Nov 2025 · 12:55
Not passed by a small majority
22
Yes (ayes)
34
No (noes)
The question is that opposition amendments (2) and (5) on sheet 3450 be agreed to.

What was debated: Australian Centre for Disease Control Bill 2025

Summarised using AI from the official Hansard transcript of the debate only. It is not a record of the debate and may leave things out. Read the Hansard below to check it.
This bill sets up the Australian Centre for Disease Control from 1 January 2026, an independent agency led by a director-general to advise governments, share health data and prepare for future pandemics, as recommended by the COVID-19 inquiry. The debate covered whether the centre is needed, its transparency and data-sharing powers, and whether it should cover chronic disease and climate health from the start. Labor and the Greens supported it, the Coalition and One Nation opposed it, and the Senate added Greens amendments including a seat for a disabled person on its advisory council.
Arguments made in support
The Government said the COVID-19 inquiry found Australia had no pandemic playbook, weak data sharing and no national public health body.
Government members said Australia was the only OECD country without such an agency, and its advice would be independent and published.
Labor speakers said better linked data across states would help detect risks faster and give consistent advice across borders.
Government members said starting with infectious diseases and reviewing in 2028 would set the centre up to succeed before widening its role.
Greens and independent members supported the centre, saying public health experts had called for one for decades.
Arguments made against, or for changes
Coalition speakers said the bill was rushed and should have had public Senate hearings, citing Australia's high pandemic preparedness ranking.
The Coalition said broad powers to withhold advice and new FOI exemptions reduce transparency, and data-sharing declarations need independent approval.
Coalition members said moving biosecurity powers away from the Chief Medical Officer to a department head could lower public confidence.
Independents and Greens said chronic disease and climate health should be covered from day one, funding was too low, and appointments should be independent.
One Nation and some Coalition members said the centre could repeat what they described as COVID-era overreach on people's freedoms.
123 speeches by 51 members in the House and Senate over 8 sitting days.
Hansard: House of Representatives, 3 Sept 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 8 Oct 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 9 Oct 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 27 Oct 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 30 Oct 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 4 Nov 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 5 Nov 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 6 Nov 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia

What was debated: Australian Centre for Disease Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025

Summarised using AI from the official Hansard transcript of the debate only. It is not a record of the debate and may leave things out. Read the Hansard below to check it.
This bill moves some public health powers to the new Australian Centre for Disease Control. It lets the centre decide which human diseases are watched at the border, manage national disease data and a lung disease registry, and protects some sensitive information from freedom of information requests. The transcript includes only the Health Minister's speeches, and the bill passed the House.
Arguments made in support
The Health Minister said an independent, science-based centre with strong data skills would spot health risks earlier and give better advice to government.
He said another pandemic will come, so the centre needs clear powers at the border and over national disease monitoring.
The Government said limits on freedom of information release balance the public's right to know with protecting personal and sensitive information.
The Government said repealing the old preventive health agency law clears the way for the centre to take on chronic disease work after a 2028 review.
4 speeches by 2 members in the House over 2 sitting days.
Hansard: House of Representatives, 3 Sept 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 27 Oct 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia

How each party voted

Labor
0 Yes
21 No
8–
Liberal
11 Yes
0 No
9–
Greens
0 Yes
8 No
1–
One Nation
3 Yes
0 No
1–
Nationals
3 Yes
0 No
Independent
0 Yes
2 No
CLP
1 Yes
0 No
UAP
1 Yes
0 No
Australia's Voice
0 Yes
1 No
LNP
0 Yes
0 No
2–
Lambie
0 Yes
0 No
1–
The last column counts members who did not vote. Party counts are for current members.
5 votes were cast by people who have since left Parliament.

No rebels

Every party member who voted went with the majority of their party.
Source: Hansard, Senate, 5 Nov 2025
Parliament of Australia, via OpenAustralia Foundation · checked 14 October 2026