Bills — Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message

House of Representatives · 30 June 2026 · 12:14
Passed by a small majority
91
Yes (ayes)
47
No (noes)
The question was not captured in the transcript.

What was debated in Parliament

Summarised using AI from the official Hansard transcript of the debate only. It is not a record of the debate and may leave things out. Read the Hansard below to check it.
This bill gives the Fair Work Commission new tools to handle a sharp rise in cases, including skipping some preliminary hearings, deciding matters on the papers with consent, and dismissing vexatious claims. It also creates a separate income threshold so more truck drivers can challenge unfair contracts, and lets the Commonwealth favour businesses with enterprise agreements when giving out contracts and grants. Most of the debate was about that last change, with the Senate adding a Greens amendment so workers cannot lose conditions in arbitrated agreements.
Arguments made in support
Government members said the commission's workload has jumped, partly due to AI-written claims, and the changes help it resolve genuine disputes faster without cutting workers' rights.
Labor speakers said truck drivers' high running costs make the current income test unfair, so a separate threshold lets more access protections.
The government said public money should be able to back employers who bargain in good faith, and the change creates an option, not an obligation.
The Greens supported the procurement change and added protections so workers cannot go backwards when bargaining breaks down.
The Coalition and independents supported the Fair Work Commission changes as practical and sensible.
Arguments made against, or for changes
The Coalition said the procurement change lets government favour businesses with union agreements, hurting small businesses that use awards, and opposed the bill unless it was split.
Coalition speakers pointed to the Watson report on CFMEU corruption and Queensland's past policy, saying the change risks higher costs and corruption.
Independents Kate Chaney, Allegra Spender and Helen Haines said contracts should be awarded on merit, and moved to remove the procurement part.
Critics said key details are left to the minister and an unreleased jobs code, and that business groups opposed the change.
The Coalition said the truck driver income threshold needed more scrutiny through a Senate inquiry.
79 speeches by 41 members in the House and Senate over 4 sitting days.
Hansard: House of Representatives, 3 June 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 24 June 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 29 June 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 30 June 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia

How each party voted

Labor
90 Yes
0 No
4–
Liberal
0 Yes
16 No
1–
LNP
0 Yes
14 No
2–
Independent
0 Yes
8 No
2–
Nationals
0 Yes
7 No
1–
One Nation
0 Yes
1 No
1–
Centre Alliance
0 Yes
1 No
Greens
1 Yes
0 No
Katter
0 Yes
0 No
1–
The last column counts members who did not vote. Party counts are for current members.

No rebels

Every party member who voted went with the majority of their party.
Source: Hansard, House of Representatives, 30 June 2026
Parliament of Australia, via OpenAustralia Foundation · checked 14 October 2026