Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail

House of Representatives · 25 Mar 2026 · 11:47
Not passed by a large majority
9
Yes (ayes)
64
No (noes)
The question is that the amendments be agreed to.

What was debated in Parliament

Summarised using AI from the official Hansard transcript of the debate only. It is not a record of the debate and may leave things out. Read the Hansard below to check it.
This bill bans life insurers from using a person's genetic test results to decide whether to offer cover or on what terms, with penalties enforced by ASIC. It also eases licensing for some foreign financial firms, updates how Australia funds the World Bank and similar banks, and scraps a planned second registration step for financial advisers. Almost all speakers supported the genetic testing ban, and debate focused on delays and on possible gaps in the protection.
Arguments made in support
Government members said fear of insurance discrimination stops people having genetic tests or joining research, citing a Monash University study where many people withdrew for this reason.
Supporters said insurers can still use symptoms, diagnoses and family history, so insurance can still be priced on risk.
The Coalition supported the bill, saying the reforms had broad agreement for years and should have come sooner.
Supporters said the other schedules cut unneeded red tape for financial advisers and give investors access to global financial services.
Independents and Labor members said a law replaces an industry-run moratorium that had not given people certainty.
Arguments made against, or for changes
The Coalition said the new funding rules for development banks allow standing spending with no clear upper limit, which reduces parliament's scrutiny.
Independents Monique Ryan and Sophie Scamps said the ban does not remove unfair terms already placed on existing policies.
Monique Ryan moved an amendment for reviews every three years instead of five, which the Government opposed as too soon.
Sophie Scamps moved amendments, based on Human Rights Commission concerns, to stop regulations narrowing what counts as protected genetic information. The Government opposed them.
Some speakers warned insurers might guess genetic results from other medical information.
78 speeches by 42 members in the House and Senate over 5 sitting days.
Hansard: House of Representatives, 26 Nov 2025 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 23 Mar 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 24 Mar 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: House of Representatives, 25 Mar 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia
Hansard: Senate, 1 Apr 2026 ›
The official Hansard (PDF), Parliament of Australia

How each party voted

Labor
0 Yes
63 No
31–
Independent
8 Yes
0 No
2–
Liberal
0 Yes
1 No
16–
Greens
1 Yes
0 No
LNP
0 Yes
0 No
16–
Nationals
0 Yes
0 No
8–
One Nation
0 Yes
0 No
1–
Katter
0 Yes
0 No
1–
Centre Alliance
0 Yes
0 No
1–
The last column counts members who did not vote. Party counts are for current members.

No rebels

Every party member who voted went with the majority of their party.
Source: Hansard, House of Representatives, 25 Mar 2026
Parliament of Australia, via OpenAustralia Foundation · checked 14 October 2026